Sotilas- ja yrityssuhteista raportoiva viikkojulkaisu Jane’s Defence Weekly on julkaissut tietoja aseistuksesta, jota Yhdysvallat sovitusta tulitauosta huolimatta toimittaa Syyrian hallitusta vastaan taisteleville ryhmille, länsimedian termistössä ”maltilliset kapinalliset” sekä ”Syyrian oppositio”.
Asetoimitukset ovat osa Yhdysvaltain Syria Train and Equip -ohjelmaa, jota on hoidettu mm. Saudi-Arabian rahoituksella.
Syyriassa sotiville kapinallisille aseita toimittava ohjelma oli määrä lopettaa, mutta Jane´s Defence Weeklyn mukaan ohjelma jatkuu.
Syyrian sotaa pitkittävää ohjelmaa on tukenut niin kutsuttu ”Aseita kapinallisille -ryhmä”, johon kuuluu mm. demokraattien presidenttiehdokas Hillary Clinton, seksiskandaalien takia eronnut CIA-johtaja, kenraali David Petraeus sekä enemmistö Yhdysvaltain ulkopolitiikkaa hoitavan poliittisen establishmentin demokraateista ja republikaaneista.
Asekuljetuksien järjestelyä kapinallisille Syyriassa on hoitanut Robert S. Ford, joka toimi Yhdysvaltain Syyrian lähettiläänä tammikuusta 2011 vuoteen 2014. Ford toimi aiemmin Yhdysvaltain lähettiläs John D. Negroponten kakkosmiehenä Bagdadissa 2004–2005, jolloin Irakissa sovellettiin käyttöön Negroponten Latinalaisessa Amerikassa toteuttamaa ns. Salvador-optiota eli siviilejä terrorisoivien ja murhaavien kuolemanpartioiden ja salaisten vankiloiden yhdistelmää.
Jane´s Defence Weeklyn lista perustuu Yhdysvaltain liittovaltion tarjoamista yritysmahdollisuuksista kertovan FBO-sivuston (Federal Business Opportunities) julkaisemiin rahtikirjoihin.
Aseet ovat alkuperältään itä-eurooppalaisia ja niihin kuuluu AK-47-kiväärejä, kevyitä ja raskaita konekiväärejä, olalta laukaistavia RPG-7-kranaatinheittimiä sekä panssarintorjuntavälineistöä, kuten 9K111M Faktoria -ohjusjärjestelmä.
Marraskuussa 2015 FBO etsi laivaajaa toimittamaan Yhdysvaltain merijalkaväen merikuljetuskomentokeskuksen puolesta alihankintana Romanian Constantasta 81 konttia aseita ja räjähteitä, yhteispainoltaan 994 tonnia. Konttien sisällöstä puolet oli määrä purkaa Turkissa Agalarissa ja puolet Aqaban satamassa Jordaniassa.
lue myös: Länsimaat ja YK: Syyrian vaalien tuloksia ei voi hyväksyä http://vastavalkea.fi/2016/04/19/lansimaat-ja-yk-syyrian-vaalien-tuloksia-ei-voi-hyvaksya/
Mikään ei Lähi-idässä muutu ellei sionismin terrori ja väkivalta hegemoniapyrkimyksineen lopu.
Asian sanoo varsin selkeästi juutalainen rauhanaktivisti, israelilaisen kenraalin poika Gilad Atzmon joka varmasti tuntee asian josta puhuu.
Videota voisi suositella Obamalle ja erityisesti Killary Clintonille joka valtaan päästyään on luvannut antaa täyden tukensa kaikille sionistien hegemoniapyrkimyksille, ehkä Iranin sodallekin?
Korjaus: Tuohon tekstiin yllä tuli nyt väärä nimi sillä tuo kenraalin poika on Miko Peled eikä Gilad Atzmon, joka kyllä myös kuuluu samaan sarjaan eli on juutalainen rauhanaktivisti, joka vertaa rasistista Israelia jopa natsi-Saksaan sen palestiinalaisiin kohdistaman vainon takia.
Peledin, Atzmonin, Shahakin, Shamirin ja monen muun juutalaisen rauhanaktivistin ohella myös Aalto yliopiston professori ottaa asiaan kantaa Facebook sivullaan
“Seuraamalla näitä uskonnollisia kappaleita, jotka on kuvattu heidän Talmudissaan… nämä Jumalan valitsemat kahelit ovat perustaneet kavalalla petoksella nykymaailman kaikkein äärifasistisimman yhteiskunnan…”
Edes sosialistista Messiasta esittävä ja juutalaisuudestaan ylpeä presidenttiehdokas Bernie Sanders ei tuo muutosta Lähi-itään — hän on vain ’hyvä rabbi’ joka sitoutuu koko sydämestään Israelin likud-rasismiin ja vain puhuu pelkkiä myötätunnon sanoja palestiinalaisista, maan todellisista asukkaista…
Bernie Sanders Has Qualified As A Rabbi
Bernie provided his answer. By ‘Jewish pride’ he meant to say that he is “a strong defender of Israel” but he also “believes that we have got to pay attention to the needs of the Palestinian people.”
This is apparently the sense of justice and impartiality conveyed by the new American socialist messiah: ’strong defense of the oppressor’ vs. ‘paying attention to the needs of the victim.’ Sadly, the position Sanders presented in Harlem is typical of the Jewish progressive approach to the Middle East. Total commitment to Israel peppered with some non-committal diluted verbal empathy towards the true people of the land i.e., the Palestinians.
Sandersia huonompi vaihtoehto on sotahaukka Killary Clinton, joka korostaa ’amerikkalaista poikkeuksellisuutta’ ja korvaamattomuutta. Hän on myös kauan sitten tehnyt AIPAC: lle selväksi että Iranin sota kyllä sopii hänelle.
Hillary Clinton has all the credentials as a pro-perpetual war candidate. That is probably because she adopts the self-serving and dangerous myth of American Exceptionalism. In her biographical book ‘Hard Choices’ and in various interviews, she has proclaimed her belief that “America remains the ‘indispensable nation.’ ” This is a dangerous posture by politicians who control nuclear arms. The history of the 20th Century and the rise of Nazi Germany should teach any democratic leader to refrain from brandishing the superiority of their nation over others.
Oleellisinta: mikä on asetoimitusten tilanne Venäjän osittaisen vetäytymisen jälkeen? – Silloinhan Putin teki Obaman kanssa sopimuksen…
Kerropa joku sopimus mitä USA olisi noudattanut. Eipä niitä ole ja aina kun oma etu vaatii kaikki sopimukset kierretään tai unohdetaan.
Miljoona kiloa ammuksia (ja aseita) yhden kuukauden laivaus? No ei oo vähän! Vaan kuinkahan paljon vie (USA:n, Israelin, Turkin, Saudi-Arabian ja Qatarin) salaiset palvelut? Niitä ei varmaan millään Web-sivulla listata.
Lähi-idän asiat ja tragediat eivät näytä suomipoikaa kiinnostavan kun kommentteja ei ole ilmaantunut. Kuitenkin hyvä muistaa että oman maamme asiat ja kohtalo ovat näihin tragedioihin vahvasti sidoksissa.
World War III Has Begun
The Third World War is currently being fought. How long before it moves into its hot stage?
By Dr. Paul Craig Roberts
Global Research, April 25, 2016
Washington is currently conducting economic and propaganda warfare against four members of the five bloc group of countries known as BRICS—Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa.
Brazil and South Africa are being destabilized with fabricated political scandals. Both countries are rife with Washington-financed politicians and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). Washington concocts a scandal, sends its political agents into action demanding action against the government and its NGOs into the streets in protests.
Washington tried this against China with the orchestrated Hong Kong “student protest.” Washington hoped that the protest would spread into China, but the scheme failed. Washington tried this against Russia with the orchestrated protests against Putin’s reelection and failed again.
To destablilze Russia, Washington needs a firmer hold inside Russia. In order to gain a firmer hold, Washington worked with the New York mega-banks and the Saudis to drive down the oil price from over $100 per barrel to $30. This has put pressure on Russian finances and the ruble. In response to Russia’s budgetary needs, Washington’s allies inside Russia are pushing President Putin to privatize important Russian economic sectors in order to raise foreign capital to cover the budget deficit and support the ruble. If Putin gives in, important Russian assets will move from Russian control to Washington’s control.
In my opinion, those who are pushing privatization are either traitors or completely stupid. Whichever it is, they are a danger to Russia’s independence.
Eric Draitser provides some details of Washington’s assault on Russia:
of Washington’s attack on South Africa:
and of Washington’s attack on Brazil:
For my column on Washington’s attack on Latin American independence, see:
As I have often pointed out, the neoconservatives have been driven insane by their arrogance and hubris. In their pursuit of American hegemony over the world, they have cast aside all caution in their determination to destabilize Russia and China.
By implementing neoliberal economic policies urged on them by their economists trained in the Western neoliberal tradition, the Russian and Chinese governments are setting themselves up for Washington. By swallowing the “globalism” line, using the US dollar, participating in the Western payments system, opening themselves to destabilization by foreign capital inflows and outflows, hosting American banks, and permitting foreign ownership, the Russian and Chinese governments have made themselves ripe for destabilization.
If Russia and China do not disengage from the Western system and exile their neoliberal economists, they will have to go to war in order to defend their sovereignty.
Paul Craig Roberts, former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal, has held numerous university appointments.
Pahalta näyttää Lähi-idän tilanne
Russia is supplying S-300 air defense systems to Iran ahead of schedule and may conclude new contracts with Tehran on arms deliveries that are not banned under international law, Alexander Fomin, the head of Russia’s Federal Service for Military Technical Cooperation, said Tuesday.
The United States is preparing to offer Israel the largest military aid package offered to any country in US history, a White House official indicated Monday.
Onko Iranin sota vältettävissä ja käynnistyykö siitä isompi sota eli WW3 ?
Nato taistelee jo Lähi-idässä Israelin ja USAn rinnalla.
Yhteistyö Israelin kanssa tehostunee kun maa pyrkii mukaan Natoon. Netanyahu tervehtii asiaa ja pitää sitä maansa turvallisuuden kannalta hyvänä asiana.
Voi kysyä miksi Israel tarvitsee Natoa hegemonian saavuttamiseen Lähi-idässä? ja siten – kuten Miko Peled yllä olevassa videossa toteaa – pysyvän rauhan estämieen alueella.
Israel to open office at NATO headquarters
(Israel Hayom/Exclusive to JNS.org) Israel on Tuesday night took another important step toward becoming a member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO). The organization announced that it will allow Israel to open an office at NATO headquarters in Brussels to push forward a process that could ultimately lead to full-fledged membership for Israel.
”I welcome NATO’s announcement, it is an important step that helps Israel’s security,” said Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. ”It is further testament to Israel’s standing and the desire of many to cooperate with us in the field of security.”
“Oil, Power and Money: ‘Assad Must Go’”
[Lainaus alkaa:] (…)
The war in Syria did not begin when the government of Bashar al Assad cracked down on protestors in the spring of 2011. That version of events is obfuscating hogwash. The war began in 2009, when Assad rejected a Qatari plan to transport gas from Qatar to the EU via Syria. As Robert F Kennedy Jr. explains in his excellent article “Syria: Another pipeline War”:
The $10 billion, 1,500km pipeline through Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria and Turkey….would have linked Qatar directly to European energy markets via distribution terminals in Turkey… The Qatar/Turkey pipeline would have given the Sunni Kingdoms of the Persian Gulf decisive domination of world natural gas markets and strengthen Qatar, America’s closest ally in the Arab world. ….
In 2009, Assad announced that he would refuse to sign the agreement to allow the pipeline to run through Syria “to protect the interests of our Russian ally….
Assad further enraged the Gulf’s Sunni monarchs by endorsing a Russian approved “Islamic pipeline” running from Iran’s side of the gas field through Syria and to the ports of Lebanon. The Islamic pipeline would make Shia Iran instead of Sunni Qatar, the principal supplier to the European energy market and dramatically increase Tehran’s influence in the Mid-East and the world…
Naturally, the Saudis, Qataris, Turks and Americans were furious at Assad, but what could they do? How could they prevent him from choosing his own business partners and using his own sovereign territory to transport gas to market?
What they could do is what any good Mafia Don would do; break a few legs and steal whatever he wanted. In this particular situation, Washington and its scheming allies decided to launch a clandestine proxy-war against Damascus, kill or depose Assad, and make damn sure the western oil giants nabbed the future pipeline contracts and controlled the flow of energy to Europe. That was the plan at least. Here’s more from Kennedy:
Secret cables and reports by the U.S., Saudi and Israeli intelligence agencies indicate that the moment Assad rejected the Qatari pipeline, military and intelligence planners quickly arrived at the consensus that fomenting a Sunni uprising in Syria to overthrow the uncooperative Bashar Assad was a feasible path to achieving the shared objective of completing the Qatar/Turkey gas link. In 2009, according to WikiLeaks, soon after Bashar Assad rejected the Qatar pipeline, the CIA began funding opposition groups in Syria.
Repeat: “the moment Assad rejected the Qatari pipeline”, he signed his own death warrant. That single act was the catalyst for the US aggression that transformed a bustling, five thousand-year old civilization into a desolate Falluja-like moonscape overflowing with homicidal fanatics that were recruited, groomed and deployed by the various allied intelligence agencies.
But what’s particularly interesting about this story is that the US attempted a nearly-identical plan 60 years earlier during the Eisenhower administration. Here’s another clip from the Kennedy piece:
During the 1950′s, President Eisenhower and the Dulles brothers … mounted a clandestine war against Arab Nationalism — which CIA Director Allan Dulles equated with communism — particularly when Arab self-rule threatened oil concessions. They pumped secret American military aid to tyrants in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Iraq and Lebanon favoring puppets with conservative Jihadist ideologies which they regarded as a reliable antidote to Soviet Marxism….
The CIA began its active meddling in Syria in 1949 — barely a year after the agency’s creation…. Syria’s democratically elected president, Shukri-al-Kuwaiti, hesitated to approve the Trans Arabian Pipeline, an American project intended to connect the oil fields of Saudi Arabia to the ports of Lebanon via Syria. (so)… the CIA engineered a coup, replacing al-Kuwaiti with the CIA’s handpicked dictator, a convicted swindler named Husni al-Za’im. Al-Za’im barely had time to dissolve parliament and approve the American pipeline before his countrymen deposed him, 14 weeks into his regime…..
(CIA agent Rocky) Stone arrived in Damascus in April 1956 with $3 million in Syrian pounds to arm and incite Islamic militants and to bribe Syrian military officers and politicians to overthrow al-Kuwaiti’s democratically elected secularist regime….
But all that CIA money failed to corrupt the Syrian military officers. The soldiers reported the CIA’s bribery attempts to the Ba’athist regime. In response, the Syrian army invaded the American Embassy taking Stone prisoner. Following harsh interrogation, Stone made a televised confession to his roles in the Iranian coup and the CIA’s aborted attempt to overthrow Syria’s legitimate government….(Then) Syria purged all politicians sympathetic to the U.S. and executed them for treason. (Politico)
See how history is repeating itself? It’s like the CIA was too lazy to even write a new script, they just dusted off the old one and hired new actors.
Fortunately, Assad –with the help of Iran, Hezbollah and the Russian Airforce– has fended off the effort to oust him and install a US-stooge. This should not be taken as a ringing endorsement of Assad as a leader, but of the principal that global security depends on basic protections of national sovereignty, and that the cornerstone of international law has to be a rejection of unprovoked aggression whether the hostilities are executed by one’s own military or by armed proxies that are used to achieve the same strategic objectives while invoking plausible deniability. The fact is, there is no difference between Bush’s invasion of Iraq and Obama’s invasion of Syria. The moral, ethical and legal issues are the same, the only difference is that Obama has been more successful in confusing the American people about what is really going on.
And what’s going on is regime change: “Assad must go”. That’s been the administration’s mantra from the get go. Obama and Co are trying to overthrow a democratically-elected secular regime that refuses to bow to Washington’s demands to provide access to pipeline corridors that will further strengthen US dominance in the region. That’s what’s really going on behind the ISIS distraction and the “Assad is a brutal dictator” distraction and the “war-weary civilians in Aleppo” distraction. Washington doesn’t care about any of those things. What Washington cares about is oil, power and money. How can anyone be confused about that by now? Kennedy summed it up like this:
We must recognize the Syrian conflict is a war over control of resources indistinguishable from the myriad clandestine and undeclared oil wars we have been fighting in the Mid-East for 65 years. And only when we see this conflict as a proxy war over a pipeline do events become comprehensible.
That says it all, don’t you think? [Lainaus päättyi]
Mike Whitney, lives in Washington state. He is a contributor to Hopeless: Barack Obama and the Politics of Illusion (AK Press).
Oil, Power and Money: “Assad Must Go”
That’s Been Washington’s ”Regime Change” Mantra from The Get Go
By Mike Whitney
Global Research, October 01, 2016
CounterPunch 15 September 2015
War Propaganda: Syria’s Destruction by the Lies of the Western Media. “Washington will Never let Go, Their Target is World Hegemony”
By Peter Koenig
Global Research, October 05, 2016
“Five million Syrian people have already been forced to leave their country. Now they are being scattered all over the Middle East: throughout Lebanon, Jordan, Iraq, Egypt, and Turkey. Some have even gone as far as Europe, Canada and Chile.
How much more can one country endure?
And how can the rest of the world just stand by and watch as it is put through hell?
The answer is obvious: the rest of the world does not know; it does not understand! The propaganda coming out of the Western mass media outlets and indoctrination-spreading institutions is so thorough, so professional, that to most of people all over the world everything related to Syria appears to be blurry, murky, and incredibly complex. President al-Assad is demonized on a daily basis. Heroic resistance is called the “regime’s brutal actions”, pro-western terror groups are described as “moderate opposition.”
This is what my good friend, Andre Vltchek, wrote in his recent piece about “Syria’s Heroic Fight Against Western Imperialism”. It is almost an understatement. Living in Europe, being exposed to the daily, hourly, horrifying barrage of abject lies, day-in-day-out, for weeks no end, is unbearable.
Europe, alias the West, has become infested with falsehoods, with thirst for profit and more gains and personal comfort, a hearth of egocentricity and disrespect for her brothers and sisters, let alone for the rest of the world – there is no equal on earth, other than the US of A, the Master of all Masters of crime and horror. Europe with its hundreds of years of colonization always was the chieftain of these ignoble attributes, but now, all scruples are gone; the veils are lifted. There is not even an iota of shame left.
Let’s face it, the six Anglo-American media giants that dominate the western world, can spend billions on propaganda. Money doesn’t matter. Money is made of thin air. Money for wars doesn’t matter either – it’s also made of thin air. It’s made by the dollar manufacturing machine, meaning the US private banking system. Today, 97% of all the money produced in the US is made by private banks in the form of debt, mostly by Wall Street. And the epitome of financial fraud throughout the globe is Goldman Sachs, the same GS that makes EU financial and monetary policy, through the European Central Bank which is headed by a former GS executive.
So the rest of the world, which is buying US debt as treasury bonds in their reserve coffers, is actually financing all the wars and the slandering of unbending nations, like Syria, Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela – and the list is growing every day, as people are resisting. Most of the propaganda is directed against the very nations that are held hostage by the western dollar-based casino scheme. To add a little caveat: It is all controlled by the Rothschild gang, in connivance with the Rockefellers and consortia of this world, as is the FED itself.
Syria’s fight is indeed heroic. She stands up tall and bold, while burying her hundreds of thousands of death, many of them women and children – the children who would be the future of Syria to rebuild their country. Now they are gone. They died miserable torturous deaths, by cluster bombs, phosphorous-laden missiles and poisonous sarin killer gas, provided to the terrorists by NATO, CIA and Mid-Eastern vassal allies. Others had to flee their homes, their country under the most horrible conditions of famine, disease, discrimination and violence. But the western MSM have brainwashed their public to believe it is the work of Bashar al-Assad, the legitimate President of Syria, who still enjoys close to 80% support of the Syrian population, with the help of Russia and, of course, as always, President Putin. It’s been said before but must be said again – we are in the midst of WWIII, but thanks to the number one diplomatic chess strategist, Vladimir Putin, we have so far been spared from a nuclear war.
Make no mistake, Washington will never let go – not by itself, never. Their target is world hegemony – the goal of their self-indulging PNAC – Plan for a New American Century. And to attain this goal, the fall of Syria had been planned long in advance, in the early 1990’s. “Regime Change” is relentlessly being pursued – see Wesley Clark at the Commonwealth Club of California, October 3, 2007 – ‘7 countries have to fall in five years’
In addition to the balkanization of Syria, along with the spreading eternal chaos throughout the Middle East and North Africa, one of the key reasons why Mr. Assad has to go – is the infamous Qatari gas pipeline which the US oil giants want to pass through Syria and Turkey – and to which Mr. Assad said NO. He said ‘no’ in 2000; and a definite ‘no’ in 2007. That’s when the CIA started recruiting and training terror groups that would eventually erupt into another ‘Arab Spring’ in 2011 in Syria, to become what’s now euphemistically called a civil war – which is another outrageous lie. It’s a full-out war, driven by Washington with NATO and its European and Mid-Eastern vassal allies – and their foot soldiers and well-paid mercenaries, the western recruited and groomed terror armies. (See F. William Engdahl, Global Research, March 16, 2016
Look at NATO aggressions at Moscow’s doorstep, the absurd and highly propagated US threats on Chinese sovereignty in the South China Sea, are clear signals, that there is no way in heaven that Washington will seriously negotiate for anything; not for a cease fire in Syria, not for reducing weapon-grade plutonium, not for a halt to fighting in the Ukraine Donbass – not for anything. Every attempt at diplomacy is an abject failure, as it is countered with verbal insults at the UN, with lies, accusations and denigrations in all western media. Syria is considered but a stepping stone towards Washington’s Full Spectrum World Dominance – the goal clearly spelled out in the PNAC.
But Syria is no stone, let alone a stepping stone. Syria is a solid rock. Syria has the world’s strongest alliance it could dream of – Russia, Iran and China. This Alliance of Peace will eventually triumph over the diabolical US-NATO-Brussels terror-alliance of destruction and killing.
Peter Koenig is an economist, and water resources and environmental specialist. He has worked for over 30 years with the World Bank, the World Health Organization, and the Swiss Development Cooperation, in Africa, Middle East, Eastern Europe and Central Asia, East and South East Asia and Latin America. Peter is also a geopolitical analyst for Global Research, Information Clearing House, RT, PressTV, Sputnik, TeleSUR and The 4th Media, China. He is the author of Implosion – An Economic Thriller about War, Environmental Destruction and Corporate Greed – fiction based on 30 years of World Bank experience around the globe. He is a co-author of The World Order and Revolution! – Essays from the Resistance.
Négociations sur la Syrie : Poutine accuse la France d’avoir cherché à «envenimer la situation»
12 oct. 2016, 14:59
Vladimir Poutine au forum économique de Moscou, le 12 octobre 2016.
Au lendemain de l’annulation par Moscou d’une rencontre qui était prévue à Paris entre François Hollande et Vladimir Poutine, le président russe s’est déclaré offensé par le comportement de la diplomatie française sur le dossier syrien.
«Ce n’est pas la France qui doit être offensée par le veto russe, mais plutôt Moscou qui doit être offensé», a déclaré le chef du Kremlin, mercredi 12 octobre, lors du forum de l’investissement de Moscou. Vladimir Poutine reproche à Paris de s’être engagé à respecter les amendements déposés par Moscou sur sa proposition de résolution au Conseil de Sécurité de l’ONU concernant la Syrie, puis d’avoir soumis un texte qui n’en tenait aucun compte – un comportement ayant contraint la Russie a user de son droit de veto.
Poutine : «Ce n’est pas à nos partenaires d’être offensés par cette situation»
«Lorsque Jean-Marc Ayrault s’est rendu à Moscou, Sergueï Lavrov [le chef de la diplomatie russe] lui a assuré que Moscou n’avait pas la volonté d’utiliser son droit de veto si la France prenait en compte les amendements proposés par Moscou», a déclaré le président russe. En d’autres termes, la France et la Russie se sont entendues sur le contenu de la proposition française.
Pourquoi la Russie n’a pas eu d’autre choix que d’imposer son veto sur la résolution française?
Or par la suite, poursuit Vladimir Poutine, le ministre des Affaires étrangères français a rencontré les dirigeants américains. Résultat : «La résolution française ne mentionnait pas du tout la responsabilité de l’opposition et de ses combattants dans la crise actuelle en Syrie.» Une manière, selon le dirigeant russe, de se plier à la volonté de Washington. «Servir les intérêts politiques des Etats-Unis, est-ce le rôle d’un pays sérieux qui prétend à un titre de grande puissance?», a-t-il regretté.
Poutine : «Servir les intérêts des Etats-Unis, ce n’est pas une politique sérieuse»
Les déclarations du chef du Kremlin sur la diplomatie française font référence à une proposition de résolution de la France sur un cessez-le-feu à Alep, soumise au Conseil de Sécurité de l’ONU le samedi 8 octobre, et rejetée en raison du veto russe. Paris avait par la suite posé son veto à la contre-proposition de Moscou, à l’unisson avec Washington et Londres.
Poutine : les Etats-Unis savent que le convoi humanitaire a été attaqué par des terroristes
Concernant la situation syrienne elle-même, le chef du Kremlin a annoncé, mercredi, connaître le responsable de l’attaque du convoi humanitaire de la Croix rouge et de l’ONU du 19 septembre dernier, qui avait provoqué la mort d’une vingtaine de civils près de la ville d’Alep. «C’était l’un des groupes terroristes [syriens]. Nous le savons, et les Etats-Unis le savent également – mais préfèrent accuser la Russie de manière fallacieuse», a déploré le dirigeant russe.
A l’issu du drame, le Pentagone avait soutenu que les véhicules humanitaires avaient été détruits par des bombardements aériens et que des avions de guerre russes se trouvaient dans la zone concernée durant les événements. Moscou avait nié ces accusations, et fait savoir qu’un drone américain surveillait le convoi, de sorte que Washington ne pouvait ignorer ce qu’il s’était réellement passé.
Poutine : «Le chantage des Etats-Unis ne passera jamais pour la Russie»
«Nous n’avons jamais voulu de rupture avec les Etats-Unis»
Vladimir Poutine a également profité de son intervention au forum de l’investissement de Moscou pour rappeler que les tensions diplomatiques entre les Etats-Unis et la Russie, au sujet notamment du dossier syrien, n’étaient pas le fait de cette dernière. «Nous n’avons jamais voulu de rupture avec les Etats-Unis. Au contraire, nous aspirons à de bonnes relations avec ce grand pays, la plus grande économie du monde», a insisté le chef d’Etat.
Washington, selon le président russe, a pour sa part contribué à refroidir les relations entre les deux pays ces derniers mois, en accusant Moscou de piratage en Amérique – la publication par WikiLeaks, notamment, des mails de la direction du Parti démocrate. Les Etats-Unis, selon Vladimir Poutine, chercheraient de cette manière à «distraire l’attention de l’essentiel des informations relayées par les hackers, qui révèlent une manipulation de l’opinion publique» de la part des responsables politiques américains.
“Voices from Syria Refute Western Propaganda: US-NATO Supported Terrorists Involved in Countless Atrocities”
By Mark Taliano
Global Research, November 13, 2016
[Lainaus alkaa:]Jad Nasr lives in Syria. He’s 29, and he has a Master’s in English literature. He sometimes uses his considerable talents by serving as translator for high Syrian dignitaries, such as the Grand Mufti.
He also has the scar from a bullet wound in his chest, and he receives death threats. He explains that terrorists shot him because they didn’t want to hear the truth. Presumably, the terrorists prefer their own version of the “truth”, as dictated by Wahhabi – supporting al Jazeera and Safa TV… as well as all mainstream media messaging promulgated by the West.
Jad’s story is not pleasant, and it highlights what Syrians have to endure on a daily basis. He says that his brother was kidnapped last year, and that the terrorists tortured him and destroyed his knees. Now he can’t walk. He also told me that his cousin, who was serving in the Syrian Arab Army, lost his leg when Wahhabi suicide bombers attacked his military vehicle. Another cousin was kidnapped in 2012, and remains in captivity.
The terrorists have a talent for kidnapping. Nasr explained that in one operation, they used false flag tactics to capture tanks, and ultimately to capture thousands of Syrian soldiers at Douma, Syria.
The terrorists also like to showcase their defensive tactics. One of their favorites is to use captives as human shields. Nasr’s testimony and video evidence demonstrate kidnapped individuals being put in cages, and used as human shields in town squares. Needless to say, when the terrorists occupy towns or parts of towns and cities, they are necessarily using human captives as shields, and the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) takes tremendous risks by fighting house to house, as they do.
Whereas the U.S, for example, carpet bombed Falluja in Iraq, the SAA, doesn’t have that “luxury” since it avoids killing Syrian civilians at all costs.
The terrorists control occupied territories with unspeakable barbarism. A witness to the massacre at Adra described the scene in these words:
The rebels began to attack the government centers, and attacked the police station—where all the policemen were killed after only a brief clash because of the large numbers of the attackers. They (the attackers) then headed to the checkpoint located on the edge of the city before moving to the clinic, where they slaughtered one from the medical staff and put his head in the popular market. They then dragged his body in front of townspeople who gathered to see what was happening. Bakery workers who resisted their machinery being taken away were roasted in their own oven. Jabhat al-Nusra and Islamic Front fighters went from house to house with a list of names and none of those taken away then has been seen since.’
When the Syrian army would try to enter Adra the Jihadists would throw women and children from the 20,000 people it captured off the top floors in front of the army.”
Nasr also discussed the lies propagated by imperialists, and believed by multitudes. He says that for the first three weeks of the so-called “revolution”, police and security personnel were ordered to not carry guns. It was during this time that 15 of Nasr’s friends were killed by so-called “peaceful protestors”.
This report is corroborated by peace activist Janice Kortright who writes:
The media lies about Syria…have been absolute…and I think media heads should face trial for war crimes and crimes against humanity for the one-sided false narrative they’ve been spreading since the Syrian War began. Even earlier…throughout the entire “Arab Spring” orchestrated by the west using “jihadists” (paid mercenaries, criminals and brain-washed radicals) to create a “New Middle East” dedicated to western dominance and control over natural resources.
This soldier, whom we interviewed in Damascus, is a personal hero and friend. A friend to whom I’ve entrusted my life and would again any time anywhere.
He was one of the soldiers in Daraa in March 2011 (where and when the violence in Syria began). This is his account and matchs several others’ first hand accounts of events there.
The life of a Syrian soldier is so hard. A terrorist paid by the US or Saudi or Qatar makes about $300 or $400 a month. A Syrian soldier receives 1/10th of that. They fight an enemy that is often inhuman. I know of one soldier who was cut to pieces while his terrorist captors had his father on the phone listening to the torturous death of his son.
FALSE: The Syrian war began when President Assad brutally put down peaceful protests.
TRUE: The Syrian War was planned in earnest by the US since 2005. The Syrian soldiers and police were not even allowed to carry weapons until the “peaceful protesters” had slaughtered several hundreds of police and soldiers.
Kortright interviewed a Syrian soldier who described the soldiers’ (unarmed) and fatal encounters with the initial, externally-orchestrated uprisings, in these words:
Soldier: I don’t know, we didn’t see them face to face. My best friend was shot, so I felt anger and sadness. I felt anger because we were ambushed in this way and all we had was batons, we couldn’t defend ourselves. We had to run, they were shooting us like birds. And the demonstrators blocked all the entrances leading to us, so no ambulances was able to reach us whatsoever, at that point. I carried my best friend and what matters for us now is to protect him and protect ourselves until we get to safety. While we were running, we were seeing our friends the civil police, how they were being killed in front of us, or shot at.
Similarly, investigative reporter Rick Sterling debunks the propaganda that “Assad kills his own people” in his description of the initial, violent protests:
“In reality, there was a violent faction from the start. In the first protests in Deraa, seven police were killed. Two weeks later there was a massacre of 60 security forces in Deraa.”
These same “peaceful protestors” were the spearhead of the Western-orchestrated “regime change” operations, wherein the Muslim Brotherhood and foreign operatives played central roles. The “Arab Spring” was a foreign intelligence operation from the beginning.
“Mark Taliano is a retired high school teacher. Currently he is a writer and activist residing in the Niagara region.” – “Currently, he is a writer, researcher, and activist.”