Tutkivan journalismin alamäki

Toki mätää on paljon, mutta kovin usein kirjoitellaan ikään kuin se mätä olisi vain Yhdysvaltojen kohdalla merkittävää. Se mätä on kaikissa valtioissa, mutta kaikilla ei ole yhtä paljon resursseja. Jos Suomella olisi Yhdysvaltain resurssit, olisi Suomi määräilemässä kaapin paikkaa siellä täällä. Jos puhutaan vain Yhdysvaltojen mädästä, unohtuu muiden suurten valtojen mätä, jota on sen verran kuin niillä on resursseja olla mätä.

Puudelin alistamisen oppitunti

Seuraavassa artikkelissa tuodaan esimerkkeihin pohjautuen hyvin esille suomalaisen valtaVALEmedian tietoja pimittävä rappiotila:

”Al-Taee saapuu kaupunkiin”,
http://vasarahammer.blogspot.com/2019/05/al-taee-saapuu-kaupunkiin.html

Tämän kun lukee riittävän monta kertaa niin eiköhän ala valjeta miksi tilanne on tämä mitä tutkivan journalismin alamäkeen(kin) tulee.
The Holy Hook
Yahweh’s Trojan Horse into the Gentile City
LAURENT GUYÉNOT
http://www.unz.com/article/the-holy-hook/

Поздравления с Днем Победы

Nevskillä on hieman tungosta: 😀

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXuZxy8eVCE

Mätä on siinä että NWO on ottanut median määräysvaltaansa lännessä ja yhteissuuntaustettua usa ensin uutisointia tulee tuutinntäydellä niin amerikassa kuin eussa että suomessa, nykyään ulkomaan uutiset on parempi lukea venäjän rt:stä kuin brysselin pravdasta.

Vaikka seuraavassa oleva artikkeli on julkaistu n. 11 vuotta sitten, niin se kuvaa edelleen hyvin valtamedian rappiotilaa Suomessa:

”Helsingin Sanomien johtama mediakontrolli Suomessa ”,
http://eaglesflysingly.blogspot.com/2008/05/helsingin-sanomien-johtama.html

Globalisti Aatos Bilderberg-Erkon lehden takapiruna on korvannut globalisti Antti Bilderberg-Herlin. Lehden agendassa tärkeimpänä on EU-diktatuuri/NWO-tyrannia.

Näyttää siltä että Suomen mediakenttä jakautuu kahteen osaan.

1. Vaihtoehto median wellihousut. Jotka ei uskalla kirjoittaa edes siitä että presidenttipyrkyri Ilja pidätettiin täysin tekaistulla ”rikos ihmisyyttä vastaan” etsintäkuulutuksella. Presidentti on valtakunnan hiearkiassa nro 1.

2. Valtamedia. Jotka kertoo mm. tarinoita trolleista. Näin vaikka Jessikka Arokin on kertonut oikeudessa ( jossa ei saanut valan velvoittamana valehdella) että ” Kukaan oikea henkilö ei voinut olla trolli ja siksi oli niin
käsittämätöntä väittää, että Aro leimaisi tavallisia ihmisiä”

Eli vaikka trolleja ei ole olemassa, niin valtamedia kirjoittelee niistä. Ja antoi myös vuoden journalistipalkinon.

Kaksi Ylen toimittajaa palkittiin Bonnierin Suurella journalistipalkinnolla. Jessikka Aron juttusarja Venäjän trollit Suomessa valittiin vuoden jutuksi

Yle veroa maksetaan vuodessa 500 miljoonaa eli 10 vuodessa 5000 miljoonaa

Kohta 1 on epäreilu, etten sanoisi. Vaihtoehtomedia tekee työtään ilman ulkopuolista rahoitusta, vapaaehtoisvoimin, arjen selviytymiskamppailujen ohella sillä ajalla mikä perheeltä ja leipätyöltä jää.
Jos ajattelen omalta kohdaltani, .niin on ollut pakko taipua siihen että minunkin vrk:ssani on 24 tuntia.
Vaihtoehtomedia tarvitsee lisää vapaaehtoisia.

Saksankielisellä alueella vaihtoehtomedia kukkii. Tällä hetkellä pelätään sensuuria. Mediatoimipisteiden tileille voi lähettää rahaa. Tilinumerot ovat näkyvissä. Saksassakin riittää työtä auktoriteettiuskoisen kansan parissa. Hallitsija – alamainen – mentaliteetti on juurrutettu syvään niiden mieliin, jotka seuraavat valta – silmänkääntötemppu -mediaa. Jos saksalaiset ”heräisivät” toimimaan kuten ranskalaiset, monet Euroopan ongelmat selätettäisiin.

Nimimerkki ’Ei hyvältä näytä’ arvioi tuossa edellä Suomen mediakenttää.

Yhtenä vaihtoehtomedian wellihousuna toteaisin seuraavaa:

Vastavalkea-verkkolehti julkaisi Tapaus Janitskinin ollessa kuumimmillaan 18.6.2018 pääkirjoituksen otsikolla ’Oikeuslaitoksen eliitin suojeluohjelma ja Ilja Janitskin’ (https://vastavalkea.fi/2018/06/18/oikeuslaitoksen-eliitin-suojeluohjelma-ja-ilja-janitskin/). Siinä ihmettelimme oikeuslaitoksen toimia ja toimme esille huolemme sananvapauden tilasta Suomessa. Näimme koko Janitskiniin kohdistuvan ajojahdin eliitin suojeluohjelmana. Jälkikäteenkin arvioiden pääkirjoitus täytti hyvin paikkansa. Sitä kommentoitiin kaikkiaan 652 kertaa, mikä lienee Vastavalkean ennätys.

Muutama vakiolukijamme ehti jo repiä pelihousunsa pääkirjoituksen näkemyksen vuoksi. Se osoitti meille vain sen, että Janitskiniin kohdistunut demonisointi, mediavaino ja oikeuden ajojahti oli ollut vaikuttavaa. Nytkin arvioiden pidän itse pääkirjoitusta tasapainoisena ja sen sisältämää arviota oikeaanosuneena.

Jo sitä ennen eli 15.1.2017 olimme julkaisseet uustisartikkelin Ilja Janitskinin presidenttiehdokkuudesta: https://vastavalkea.fi/2017/01/15/ilja-janitskin-ehdokkaaksi-presidentinvaaleihin/.

Ajatus Ilja Janitskinin pääsystä presidentiksi oli täysin epärealistinen. Siinä ei olisi auttanut, vaikka Vastavalkea-verkkolehtikin olisi asettunut koko voimallaan tukemaan hanketta.

Vastavalkean toimituslinja poikkeaa koko lailla paljon MV-lehden toimituslinjasta. Edustamme totuudellista, punnittua ja shokeeraamatonta journalismia, jonka viileään totuutta tavoittelevaan objektiivisuuteen pyrkivät artikkelit kutittavat enemmän järkeä kuin tunnetta. Tällä linjalla aiomme myös jatkaa.

Riikka vastasi yllä jo osaltaan nimimerkin kommenttiin.

Painotan tuota Riikan esittämää pyyntöä uusien tekijöiden mukaantulosta Vastavalkean toimintaan. Ilahduttavasti heitä on nyt tullutkin, mutta lisää vielä mahtuu, sekä tekijöiksi, kommentoijiksi, lukijoiksi että tukijoiksi.

Hyvä, tärkeä ja erittäinkin ajankohtainen kirjoitus.
Onhan tutkiva journalismi selvästi alennustilassa, ollut sitä jo pidempään. Välillä kummastelen kuitenkin sellaista asiaa, että mihin katoaa kaikkien niiden yliopisto maailmankin kriittiset ja kantaaottavat äänet. Niitäkin nimittäinen ajoittain putkahtelee sieltä täältä esiin, joko painetuin tai puhutuin sanoin. Yksi syy varmasti on mediassa itsessään, esimerkiksi televisiossa esiintyy lähtökohtaisesti aina samaa mantraa esittävät ja nykyistä paradigmaa edustavat puhujat ja asiantuntijat. Tämä onkin oiva keino vaientaa kriittiset äänet marginaaliin. Toinen syy on tietysti juuri naurunalaiseksi asettaminen, tavalla tai toisella. Mutta toisaalta tutkivan journalismin voi nähdä tekevän uutta nousuaan, jos se nyt on koskaan mihinkään kadonnutkaan. Se on vain onnistuttu valtaapitävien taholta marginalisoitumaan ja menemään ikäänkuin ”maan alle” todella tehokkaasti.

2000-luvun ylivoimaisesti suurin valeuutinen oli 911-tapahtuma ja siitä sepitetty valemedioiden lanseeraama kertomus. Tässä valehtelussa ja lavastuksessa olivat mukana kaikki valtamediat: Fox, MSNBC, CNN, NBC ja tietysti BBC, joka vielä teki tosi pahan mokan ja paljasti koko valheen.

Mainio 20 minuuttinen dokkari aiheesta 911, mukana myös ihmisten tallentamia VHS tallenteita suorista V-median uutislähetyksistä ja tietysti iso joukko ”kriisinäyttelijöitä” (siis valehtelijoita), toivotan viihtyisää 20 minuuttista: 😀

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=994&v=WHlJYqd7jKo

”Onko kyse sitten huoraamisesta vaiko todellisen tiedon puutteesta (sitä ei ole edes opetettu) tai haluttomuudesta syventyä siihen ja ottaa sitä vastaan koska se tuottaisi tuskaa? Vaikea sanoa mutta aika vähän näkee siihen paneutuvia. Pelottaako totuus?
Riskinä on että joutuu erilleen ’oppineiden tai valistuneiden laumasta’, kenties vainotuksikin, mutta mitä hyvää seuraa siitä että tosiasioista vaietaan?”

Varmaan jokainen näistä pitää sisällään totuuden siemenen. Varmasti ”oppineita” pelottaa astua vieraalle ja uudelle alueelle, oman mukavuusalueen ulkopuolelle. Toiseksi, juuri ulkopuoliseksi joutuminen, ehkä myös taloudellisen turvan ja työpaikan mahdollinen menettäminen, sosiaalisen statuksen kärsiminen jne., aiheuttavat pelkoja, eikä uskalleta vaihtaa ”leiriä”. Mutta kuten sanoit, vaikeneminen ei ainakaan muuta, saati paranna nykyisen kehityksen suuntaa.

”As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, the reality we must come to terms with is that in the post-9/11 America we live in today, the government does whatever it wants, freedom be damned.

We have moved beyond the era of representative government and entered a new age.
You can call it the age of authoritarianism. Or fascism. Or oligarchy. Or the American police state.

Whatever label you want to put on it, the end result is the same: tyranny.

Source Zero Hedge
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=188149

Meillä ihan samat probleemat, kas kummaa…

America in denial: Gabor Maté on the psychology of Russiagate

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uR07OtEhKPE

Jääkö Jerusalem hopealle ? … Moskovastako uusi ’maailman metropoli’ ? ja Venäjästä uuden nousevan terveemmän kulttuurin luoja, jota nwo-mafia ei ole onnistunut mäfättämään
Ten Signs Western Society is a Satanic Cult
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=109827

Russia’s Coming Destiny
What follows is the text of an email that was originally sent in 2011 and then sent again, slightly updated, in 2013.

It’s important because the correspondent predicted the Iraq invasion years before it occurred. In other words he’s gifted with an uncanny foresight. He sent me the following reminder a few days ago and it is vitally important as it throws new light on Russia and its relations with Israel.
This is particularly important reading for those who argue that:

1) Vladimir Putin is a “crypto-Jew”
2) Or that he’s in league with the global elite.

He’s neither.
I’ve just returned from a brief visit to Moscow and was struck a number of things:
1) First and foremost, Western economic sanctions on Russia are not working. New high-rises are going up all over Moscow, and supermarkets are better stocked than when I first visited Moscow nearly 18 years ago. Moreover, there seems to be a wider variety of quality merchandise available. If the West is indeed waging economic war on Russia it’s having little obvious effect in the capital. In addition the infrastructure is better maintained and services are more efficiently delivered than when I first visited.

2) Crucially, Russia’s military seem much more formidable than they did at the end of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. While Russia’s armed forces are smaller now they are better trained and equipped. Furthermore, more than half of Russia’s military personnel are now professional and this showed in the efficient, professional way they conducted their recent campaign in Syria.

The email begins:

Thanks Rixon.
Here is the record of the email I sent in 2011
Libya – Done
Syria – In the works for over two years
Venezuela (quietly in the background) – Done
North Korea – Strong Resistance – Since 30 March 2013 they are officially at war with the USA according to the North Korean Government. The transcript of the declaration of war makes for interesting reading. It very directly addresses the reasons why they are a target of the USA. The USA has yet to fire a bullet across the border as N Korea will retaliate with a nuclear strike.
Iran- Complete Resistance = Attack on Syria will be the final trigger on this as you know.
WW3 Northern Hemisphere
Russia, Scorpionic nation, steps in, turns on it’s masters and sets the balance right.
Israel as we know it today annihilated …

Regards
Alexis
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=188247

Jostain syystä kommentti jossa on linkki tähän sivustoon ei tallennu tänne.
Siksi nyt näin paljon tekstiä suoraan linkistä aiheesta joka meidän tulevaisuutta ajatellen on enemmän kuin tärkeä.
Omalla koneellasi voit ehkä saada artikkelin avattua occidental Observer sivustolta
The Jewish Origins of the Open Borders Movement (OBM)

In a 2015 essay on ‘Whiteness studies’ I attempted to lay the groundwork and contextualization for a more developed study of the scale and devastating impact of contemporary Jewish intellectual activism in our colleges, universities, and wider culture. In that essay I noted the importance of Jewish activists … who between the mid-1970s and late 1990s engaged in an effort to develop an academic discipline known as ‘Whiteness studies.’
Since its inception, Whiteness studies has occupied a unique space in an increasingly multicultural disciplinary landscape. Unlike Black studies, Jewish studies, or Asian studies, this sphere of academia is not intended to constructively explore the achievements, history, and culture of its scrutinized ethnic group. Rather, the genre exists to subject ‘Whiteness,’ and by implication White people, to a uniquely hostile dialectic consisting of the debasement of White culture, the degradation of White history, and the delegitimization of the European claim to existence. As such, the discipline may be regarded as an act of ethnic warfare, based as it is on the intended conquest of minds and consciences, and eventually, resources and territory.
In all Western countries, Whiteness studies, in both its academic and social justice expressions, remains disproportionately directed by Jews. This is an empirically observable fact.
Jewish involvement is perhaps even more intense in the sphere of so-called social justice activism…. While the weakening of the internal or psychological supports of White identity is sufficiently problematic in itself, the problem is compounded by intensive Jewish activism in other spheres of academic and ‘social justice’ activity. The most damaging in these respects are the Jewish dominance in ‘critical race theory,’ and its correspondent political expression in the form of the open borders movement.
Readers who have been observing the ongoing ‘refugee crisis’ over the last couple of years will most likely have come across the phrase “No one is illegal” at some point. The refrain is particularly popular in Germany, where Kein mensch ist illegal became the rallying cry of tens of thousands of successfully deracinated German liberals, and thus was a key feature of the migrant tsunami that would engulf that unfortunate nation.

And indeed, it was Germany that first gave birth to the term and the movement it would encapsulate. It was at the documenta X art exhibition in Kassel in 1997 that this particular ‘anti-racist’ movement is largely considered to have been formally founded. That year’s exhibition and the movement it spawned were organized by French-Jewish ‘Artistic Director’ Catherine David. David was keen to turn the entire exhibition into a political statement, something that didn’t endear her to some of Germany’s more conservative art critics. Undeterred, she turned the city of Kassel itself into a ‘lesson’ for gallery visitors, and one of her artist associates and fellow Jews, Lois Weinberger, even planted ‘flourishing weeds’ from southern and southeastern Europe along the disused tracks at Kassel’s main railway station as a metaphor for migration and a ‘post-national’ world. Amidst the flagrant promotion of fellow Jews Eva Hesse and Chantal Ackerman, it was the fervid Jewish intellectual atmosphere of documenta X, and its abstract theories about migration and ‘post-national’ identity, that gave rise to Kein Mensch ist Illegal, a phrase that those present borrowed from the writings of Elie Wiesel.
Although the formal origins of the movement may be traced to Kassel 1997, this was arguably only the spiritual birth of the group and its specific ideology. More formal codification of its theory would arrive in the early 2000s with the publication of British-Jewish intellectual Steve Cohen’s No One Is Illegal: Asylum and Immigration Control, Past and Present (2003). Cohen, who died in 2009, had by then worked for three decades as an immigration lawyer in Manchester, where he set up the Greater Manchester Immigration Aid Unit, and participated in Anti-Deportation Campaigns. He was a member of the International Marxist Group (IMG) from 1968 until the end of 1974, though he appears to have been very publicly engaged in Far Left politics until he was beaten unconscious by British Nationalists who broke up one of his meetings in 1976. Thereafter his public involvement appears to have lessened and took on a more reclusive aspect. Cohen was a member of the Jewish Socialist Group for most of his life, and he was a quintessential Jewish intellectual in that he was both prolific and intense, writing books, manifestos, and pamphlets about anti-Semitism, socialism, immigration, borders and the welfare state.

In 2003, Cohen capped thirty years of activism with the publication of his opus, No One Is Illegal. While the slogan-title was perfectly fitted to Cohen’s own ideological trajectory, he was also keenly aware of its resonance on the Continent, where it was the main statement of the Jewish-inspired transnational European open borders network which formed in the late 1990s. This network had by 2000 developed into the main grassroots grouping of radical migration-related politics on a European level. One of its primary tactics was the maintenance of an ongoing visible presence in border camps such as the notorious camp at Calais, along with political campaigns against migration control, and Europe-wide action days. Cohen’s contribution to such ‘direct action’ politics, via the publication of his book and an accompanying manifesto, was to provide both rarefied theory and abstract ‘moral’ justification.
Cohen’s theories were, and remain, extremely basic. They draw heavily from his Jewish background, in the sense that Cohen has a highly fluid, abstract, and nomadic attitude to the nation state and nationality in general. Having been wanderers upon the earth since pre-history, one can hardly be surprised that, Zionist distractions aside, Jews would continue to possess an aversion to “soil” nationalism, even if they maintain the absurd pretense that “blood” nationalism matters as little to them. The central issue here resides in the fact that Jews have been remarkably, and very problematically, insistent on corroding the soil-attachment of the settled peoples among whom they dwell. Steve Cohen was a perfect example of this highly corrosive force. In his 2003 No One Is Illegal manifesto he asserted that immigration controls “are inherently racist in that they are based on the crudest of all nationalisms — namely the assertion that the British have a franchise on Britain.”

In Cohen’s worldview the British, and Whites wherever they are, are mere squatters on land they can be rightfully dispossessed of. Their resources are free for the taking in the course of “competition.” Cohen, the apparent life-long Communist universalist, thus reveals a startlingly capitalist/social Darwinist view of land and territory, even to the extent of employing Capitalist language (‘franchise’) in order to make his point. This struck me at first reading as a vindication of Yockey’s idea that Marxism has an unshakeable “Capitalistic provenance,” but even stronger was the echo of the familiar socio-political position of ‘the Jew’ as both arch Communist and Capitalist.
Like that of many Jews, Cohen’s political ideology was itself fluid and lacking borders, characterized chiefly by racial opportunism. For instance, we know that Cohen would never say that the British were entitled to colonize Africa in the nineteenth century because of the absurdity of the “Africans having a franchise on Africa.” The reason for this is that Cohen’s theory, like anything derivative of Jewish Bolshevism, isn’t really about open borders, or Socialism, at all. It is instead about White dispossession. Cohen’s formulations and arguments all focus on non-White migrants seeking entry to historically White nations. His argument about the “franchise” on land is little more than a blueprint for dispossession, inspired by his own archaic Jewish grievances, real or imagined.

Cohen’s ‘theory’ progresses to the statement that immigration controls “are only explicable by racism. Their imposition is a result of and is a victory for racist, proto-fascist and actual fascist organizations. It is impossible to see how legislation brought into being by such means, legislation accompanied by the most vile racist imagery and assumptions, can ever be reconfigured and rendered ‘fair’.” It is difficult to imagine that anyone with a reasonable level of intelligence could ever accept arguments like these. Even setting aside racial prerogatives, the idea that immigration controls are “only explicable by racism” is incredibly weak given that it ignores the imperatives of national security, cultural preservation, and the protection of jobs, health, and wages. One assumes that Cohen would have seen “vile racist imagery” in even the most everyday concern of a British housewife that her child should have a place in the local school, or a bed in the local hospital. His argument relies on there being an “implicit Fascism” in these important facets of life in White nations. This was something that Cohen probably did perceive, but only because of the miasma of grievances, inadequacies, and psychological complexes implicit in his own ethnic background.
The third key argument of Cohen’s manifesto is that “the demand for ‘fair’ controls simply ignores the link between immigration controls and welfare entitlements. This link is itself intrinsically unfair — and racist.” Cohen’s preoccupations with ‘fairness’ and ‘racism’ are here employed again to obfuscate the genuine and necessary concern of citizens who have invested in a welfare system built and developed in a once ethnically-homogenous and high-trust society. Cohen viewed the desire of the British to stop immigrant non-investors from reaping disproportionate gains from their welfare state as ‘unfair’ and ‘racist.’ To paraphrase our Jewish theorist, Cohen refuses to accept that foreigners do not have a “franchise” on British money. Cohen also refuses to acknowledge that a state with no borders will in time cease to be a state at all. In such an environment a ‘welfare state’ becomes an impossibility.

The final facet of Cohen’s ‘Open Borders’ manifesto ends with the assertion that “controls can never be ‘fair’ to those who remain subject to them.” Cohen’s argument here is based on a putative entitlement of the foreigner. Cohen’s believes that the stranger is entitled to limitless acquiescence. ‘Fairness,’ in Cohen’s mind, is the opening of the gates of Britain, a tiny country already struggling with a population of 64 million, to a world holding 7.5 billion people. ‘Fairness’ in this calculation amounts to national suicide, not merely in the sense of the forfeiture of national borders and institutions, but the total annihilation of the organic nation in the form of the British people. In this sense, it is a manifesto for genocide.
This sinister document was the foundation stone of the ‘No One is Illegal’ movement in Britain, where a group adopting the same name was launched under the leadership and direction of Steve Cohen, his co-ethnic associate David Landau, and two women of unknown provenance. Over the last few years No One Is Illegal groups have been formed throughout Europe and the United States: Spain (Ninguna Persona Es Ilegal), Sweden (Ingen Manniska Ar Illegal), Poland (Zaden Czlowiek Nie Jest Nielegalny) and Holland (Geen Mens Is Illegaal). These groups have been allied to growing activist organizations calling themselves ‘No Borders.’

Far from declining with the death of Steve Cohen, the Jewish prominence in the Open Borders movement has perhaps become even more acute in recent years. The range of theory underpinning the effort has also slightly diversified. George Mason University professor Bryan Caplan is the founder of openborders.info and is the most visible North American figure calling for an end to immigration control. Just last year Caplan wrote an article for TIME in which he argued that “instead of redoubling our efforts to curtail immigration, we should return to the historic American policy of open borders—admitting everyone eager to come build a better life for themselves.” Unlike Cohen’s arguments, Caplan relies on an exclusively capitalist appeal — the lie that open borders will mean the influx of immigrants who will make American’s richer. As far as lies go, this must rank somewhere alongside that of Menasseh Ben Israel (1604–1657), who not only told Oliver Cromwell that a readmission of Jews to England would make the nation richer, but that it would also lead to the imminent return of Jesus Christ.
Caplan boldly claims, without statistics or evidence, that “immigrants, like tourists, are normally paying customers, not beggars.” However, we know from statistics that they are beggars. It has been estimated that “40% of young Muslims in France and 50% in Germany are unemployed and in receipt of social benefits. For example, an estimated 40% of welfare outlays in Denmark go to the 5% of the population that is Muslim. According to Otto Schily, former German interior minister, speaking of immigrants in general: “Seventy percent of the newcomers [since 2002] land on welfare the day of their arrival.” In Sweden, perhaps the most acute case, immigrants are estimated at 1.5 million out of 10 million people; immigration is estimated to cost almost $14 billion per year.” Completely ignoring this reality, Caplan’s refrain is that “immigrants are rarely charity cases.” In fact, in Caplan’s argument immigrants will bring their nations “trillions of dollars of extra wealth creation, year after year.” This is the promise of the Second Coming for an atheistic and materialistic age.

Taking his cue from Steve Cohen, Caplan published his own manifesto on “Open Borders Day, March 16th 2015.” The manifesto is signed disproportionately by Jewish and non-White intellectuals from colleges across the United States, but also including some in Canada and Europe. A particularly interesting aspect of the manifesto is that it avoids the economic ploys raised by Caplan in his TIME article, and instead returns to the empty moralizing of Steve Cohen’s 2003 effort. Caplan argues that “freedom of movement is a basic liberty that governments should respect and protect unless justified by extenuating circumstances. This extends to movement across international boundaries.”
Caplan continues that “border controls predominantly restrict the movement of people who bear no ill intentions. Most of the people legally barred from moving across international borders today are fleeing persecution or poverty, desire a better job or home, or simply want to see the city lights.”

They simply want to see the city lights? Caplan and his supporters demand that “international borders should be open for all to cross, in both directions.” This refrain about traffic moving in “both directions,” is one of the more insidious and disingenuous ploys of the open borders advocates. Indeed, it is at the core of the effort to convince Whites that by abandoning their borders they too will be “set free.” But how long will be the line be for flights from New Hampshire to Mogadishu? From Copenhagen to Damascus? In the nightmarish realization of the dreams of Cohen, Caplan, and their swelling numbers of colleagues, there will be no traffic in “both directions.” There will be an almighty surge from all dark corners of the earth to those parts of it where the last dim light of civilization yet glows.
*****

In Sun Tzu’s Art of War it is noted that it is a better offensive tactic to take your opponent’s forces whole rather than in piecemeal fashion. National borders, national identities, and the piecemeal nature of the White socio-political existence are obstacles to globalists of all descriptions seeking our defeat.
Much better for them that we be united in economic bond-houses like the European Union, where diktats and immigration directives can be handed down to the great mass, leaving no stone unturned, no patch of land untouched.
Much better for them that our borders be obliterated, absorbing us forever into the great chaos of dark humanity.
But, as Sun Tzu said, knowing your enemy can be a first step to successful defense. And perhaps now we have a slightly clearer appreciation of his tactics and his methods.

Valitettavaa on ettei läntisestä anglo-sionistisesta kulttuurista enää löydy Frederik SUUREN KALTAISIA jotka voisivat estää kulttuurin mätänemisen josta ’sionistijutikat’ rapparilakeijoineen ovat pitäneet huolen saadessaan yhä enemmän jalansijaa sen sisällä.
Kun lukee maailmansotien ja bolsevismin historiaa niin tajuaa kuina raadollisista ja petomaisista ihmisistä on kyse.
Olisi todella ihmiskunnan katastrofi jos nämä itsensä valituiksi nostaneet ihmiset tai ’ihmisen tapaiset’ saisivat planeetan hallintaansa.
Mutta ilman Frederik The Great kaltaisia valistuneita johtajia tuota kohtaloa lienee mahdotonta välttää. Perikato on jo ovella. Länsi tuhoutuu. Ja valitettavasti me sen mukana.

Puhumattakaan laajemmin sotiin liittyvistä raakuuksista pelkästään tämä Dresdenin järjetön ja mielenvikaisuudesta kertova tuhoaminen riittää kertomaan minkälaiset psykopaatit ovat asialla.

How Many Germans Died Under RAF Bombs at Dresden in 1945?
JOHN WEAR
Based on a comparison to the Pforzheim bombing and the other similar bombing attacks, a death toll in Dresden of 250,000 people is easily possible.
http://www.unz.com/article/how-many-germans-died-under-raf-bombs-at-dresden-in-1945/

The Ritual Talmudic Execution and Torture Methods of the Bolsheviks Were Satanic
Mike Walsh
https://russia-insider.com/en/history/ritual-talmudic-execution-and-torture-methods-bolsheviks-were-satanic/ri25529

The Mental Condition of Winston Churchill
”Nothing in life is so exhilarating as to be shot at without result.” Churchill said in 1897 in Afghanistan.
https://russia-insider.com/en/history/mental-condition-winston-churchill/ri26462
https://russia-insider.com/en/churchill-was-evil

Haluatko tietää mikä kuva Suomesta leviää netissä?
Tutkivan journalistin artikkeli Suomen raiskauksesta leviää maailmalla — The Rape of Finland: Multiculturalism Gone Mad
LD: According to the recently released World Happiness Report by the UN, Finland was nominated the “happiest place on earth” in 2019 for the second year in a row. When quizzed by reporters, most Finns disagreed with this finding and said they had little to feel happy about, given the rape epidemic and the deadly virus of mass immigration created by the People Destroyers.
Watch this video and decided for yourself: Who is to blame for throwing open this Pandora’s box of evils?
https://www.darkmoon.me/2019/the-rape-of-finland-multiculturalism-gone-mad/
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=188517

Unz sivuston puolella tutkiva journalismi toimii eikä heti tule syytöksiä antisemitismistä kun mennään asiaan.

Israel’s Role In 9/11
FBI evidence supports prior knowledge or complicity
PHILIP GIRALDI
http://www.unz.com/pgiraldi/israels-role-in-9-11/
The Holy Hook
Yahweh’s Trojan Horse into the Gentile City
LAURENT GUYÉNOT
http://www.unz.com/article/the-holy-hook/

bc on raikas tuulahdus näivettyneeseen journalismiin.

Heidän oli helppo iskeaä analyyttisin/analysoivin ja todisterikkain artikkelein, kun valtamedia vain joojotteli ja nyökytteli, kopioi toistensa tekstejä/artikkeleita.

Raflaavat otsikot on liikaa saaneet rahantuojan roolia lehtitaloille?
Siksi tutkiva journalismin on yleisesti ollut rappiolla ja uutta verta & kansalaisaktivismia kaivattiin?

Vapaamuurari Olli Rehnin uskonkappaleen selittää se, että Suomen vapaamuurarit ovat suoraan U.S.A:n vapaamuurarien alaisia, ainoina Euroopassa.